Specialized in Object and Library & Archive Conservation
Cartonnage
Report Summary
Owner: Philadelphia Museum of Art
Accession #: L-55-289
Object: Funerary Mask
Object Date: Roman Period, Ancient Egypt
Materials: Cartonnage (plaster, linen)
Dimensions: 55.5 x 32.5 x 21 cm
Consulted:
Penn Museum Conservation Staff
Philadelphia Museum of Art Conservation Staff - This object is on long-term loan to the Penn Museum from the Philadelphia Museum of Art (PMA) and required the PMA to approve the treatment proposal before beginning treatment.
Report Date: 07.01.2022
Treatment Images
Historical Context and Significance
There are a variety of symbols, both painted and sculptural, that represent ancient Egyptian beliefs around life and the afterlife. On the top of the head is a scarab with wings. Scarabs represent the cycle of the sun and rebirth. They are also symbols of transformation, which was essential to transitioning to the afterlife. Funerary masks are often gilded, because gold guarantees one’s ability to speak in the afterlife. It is unclear why the whole face is gilded, as opposed to solely the lips. The ability to have one’s entire face gilded could be a status symbol and represent a certain level of status in ancient Egyptian society.
See full report for citations and references
Materials and Technology
Plaster:
Whiting plaster (sometimes referred to as gesso) is limestone powder mixed with adhesive. This type of plaster provides a smooth surface for painting or gilding and was often used for cartonnage masks and coffins. Whiting plaster was most likely used to construct this object.
Gilding:
Two cartonnage masks from the Roman period were found to have red bole in the gilding substrate. The presence of bole supports a water gilding type process, as bole is necessary for water gilding. Other gilded objects from the Roman period have a yellow bole on a plaster substrate, and no bole on gesso covered wooden substrates. The lack of bole suggests an oil gilding type process, as oil gilding can be applied to surfaces without bole. This object likely underwent a water gilding type process due to the presence of bole. Water gilding can be burnished, and oil gilding cannot. The scratch marks on the face and ears could be from burnishing but could also be from past vigorous cleaning. It is unclear if the gilding was burnished.
Pigments:
The red pigment could be a red ochre (hydrated iron oxides), or a red lead pigment. Red ochre was used from the fifth dynasty to the Roman period. A red lead pigment called minimum was found on a fragment of Early Roman period cartonnage in the Archaeological Research Collection of the School of Religion at the University of Southern California. XRF analysis of this pigment could help determine if it is a red lead.
Egyptian blue a synthetic pigment created by heating up silica, copper, and an alkali material together. Egyptian blue has the potential to degrade to a superficial green or to an almost black due the malachite (which contains copper) included. The blue areas of decoration on the face appear dark green. The blue on the face appears almost black, but upon closer inspection has a green tone to it. It is unclear if this is due to mixing the Egyptian blue with a dark pigment, the result of the Egyptian blue degradation process, or both. The black pigment used is likely a carbon-based pigment.
Green frit was often used as in earlier periods of Egypt. It is composed of copper wollastonite, and a glassy phase high in sodium, potassium, and copper chlorides. Other greens in the Roman period were Egyptian blue mixed with orpiment (a yellow pigment), green earth, and organic copper bound by protein-based glue. Because the areas of green on this object do not luminesce under conditions for identifying Egyptian blue, the inclusion of Egyptian blue is not likely. XRF analysis can provide further information on the green pigment by identifying elements in the composition. This analysis would also be beneficial for identifying the yellow used, as pararealgar and yellow ochre were used in addition to orpiment.
What appears to me as a purple may be a pink, considering there were no true purples used in Egyptian paintings. The pink on this object is potentially madder painted over gypsum white as this was a common pink in the Roman period. The UV examination evidence supports the pink having a madder component. Gypsum white (calcium sulphate) and whiting chalck (calcium carbonate) are two white pigments found in ancient Egypt from the fifth dynasty to the Roman period. Lead white is also a possible pigment, though it has not been found on Egyptian objects, has been on Roman objects and may have been introduced during the Roman Period.
See full report for citations and references
Condition and Description
The cartonnage is from a funerary context and made of layers of material. First is a plaster layer, then linen in a 1x1 weave pattern, then a layers of plaster thicker than the first, then painted designs and gilding. The piece is attached to a wooden backing board by at least one string punctured through the object and tied onto a metal loop attached to the board. The more 3-dimensional areas of the object are hollow. The object is overall unstable with cracks and losses throughout. Most cracks are below the neck, and the majority of loss is near the bottom of the object.
The design is of a human face wearing a nemes headcloth with ears exposed. The headcloth contains designs similar to that of the surrounding material. The headcloth and surrounding area are painted with designs of people, snakes, Egyptian deities, and circular motifs. The colors of paint used are red, blue, green, purple, black, yellow and white. The face is gilded, with the eyebrows and eye makeup painted in blue, whites of the eyes painted white, and pupils painted black. Carved in relief on top of the headcloth is gilded scarab beetle with bird wings carrying the sun. There is a puncture in the proper right (PR) edge of the object below the PR ear. Paint loss is exhibited throughout, but especially in the designs underneath the neck, and along the top of the nemes headcloth. There is cotton stuffing inside the hollow head of the object, put there relatively recently for support.There are scratch marks exposing a red material where the gilding appears to have worn away. There is also wear in the scarab gilding, exposing a red surface underneath.
Ultraviolet (UV) photography indicates the purple color is likely partially composed of madder pigment, given its greenish yellow fluorescence. The exposed plaster fluoresces bright green, indicating it is likely mixed with an animal-based adhesive. This supports the idea that the plaster is a whiting plaster. Egyptian blue was used in making the blue pigment. Using visible induced luminescence, the blue areas luminesce purple, signifying Egyptian blue.
Ethical Considerations
Should this object even really go on display? Should I even be treating it? I am wrestling with these questions because this object was never intended to be resurfaced and was made to accompany the person into their afterlife. From a conservation perspective the piece is very cool to look at, the treatment will be very intricate and give me a lot of good experience, and I am excited to treat it. However, I wonder about the spiritual repercussions of fixing an object like this. Was it intended to degrade? Is there a time limit on the afterlife process where perhaps once the burial occurs (or shortly after) everything for the afterlife is set, therefore disturbing the burial thousands of years later has no repercussions on the spirit and person the mask was intended to accompany? I do not know the answer. My resolve it to approach the object with care, respect, and good intention. I feel that is the best I can do given my lack of power and influence as an intern at this institution. I do not have control over the exhibition plans or the object list, but I do have control over myself and how I approach the object.
Treatment Summary
Treatment Mount
In order to treat the object from behind I created a mount out of WoodEpox, blue board, and Ethafoam. This allowed the object to be turned over and removed from its previous mount of an old board.
PC: Tessa de Alarcon
Mending
To mend tears and losses I toned Japanese paper to a brown that matched the color of the linen using Golden Fluid Acrylics. I chose 5% methyl cellulose in water as adhesive so the mends would not be disturbed by the acetone used to remove the facing later on.
Permanent Mount
The permanent mount is composed of two pieces of WoodEpox and three pieces of Ethafoam. The WoodEpox portion was created in two pieces to avoid locking the mount inside the object. The Ethafoam secures the two pieces in place with wooden skewers adhered to the mount with Apoxie Sculpt.
PC: Tessa de Alarcon
Humidification
The back of the piece was initially crumpled from the previous mounting. I used a preservation pencil to humidify the areas and make them easier to reshape. Then I placed Volara and soft tipped clamps to let the pieces dry after re-shaping.
Consolidation
After the permanent mount was complete I was able to secure any remaining loose pieces. I removed any facing by brush applying acetone and used 5% methyl cellulose as the adhesive.